Sunday, February 3, 2019

Instead of assuming people have different nature pay attention to the benefits they reach for in that

Often people who suppose that different people have different ages old nature which may be evil too, end up interpreting ordinary rules of behaviour as if one ought to allow evil deeds freely, but that is an error in the picture of the world. All people and animals have at a general level the same basic nature which includes using the senses, moving, eating, understanding, feeling, being part of the social environment for example of the society, communicating in some way, etc. It does not include things that are consequences of the way of w´grew uo or the like, even though it ind´cludes a good understanding and being in a good way a part of the society. Typically people who like to be termed evil, malicious or the like, search for some benefit in sio doing, for example gaining position, rights, some classification for themselves, some reputation that gives the social support, some type of things to do that they like doing, etc, and the situation would oftne be quite easy to understand if one noticed those benefits and centered one's understanding of the situation largely on them being a quite big motivation.

Often people see differencies in how war like one's views are as a conflict that they do not know how to solve, but typically on a general level just about all have the same view: to live their life  while being strong enough to protect and keep their sides, but their social pictures of the world are very different, likewise their level and type of social eye and wisdom of life, and so their favourite professions with their skills, skill level and task in the society and maybe in the world are very different.

Friday, November 16, 2018

How place and climate affect culture

The older I have become, the more I have noticed that many Finns were originally from some far away country in a different climate or that they have long been very interested in some far away culture and changed to be much like it. Foreigners do not always understand why one should live in he Finnish way when one lives in Finland, but since Finnish traditions have strong grounds as skills instead of being forced upon people without much idea why, the question is quite straightforward: why are just Finnish ways best in Finland?
Each country has it's own situation, it's own place in the world, in which ceryain tactics are best. The climate determines a lot about what is a good way to live, and that determines how much understanding, eyesight, skills at large they have, what kinds of emotional life they have, how active they are, what is so the best way for them to live as a society, for example wortk. Military situation in what comes to other countires determines a lot about what kids of tactics the locals invest in, so it determines alot about for example types of crime and best ways of handling such crimes, the freedoms and obligations of individuals, what the society supports them towards.Temperature determines a loyt about social distance: how much bacteria there usually is from others.

Tuesday, October 16, 2018

Basics of safety in jobs with position

If you have position, many people direct their wishes to you. So it atters enermously that you can fit them together in a wise way. A good choise for that is bureaucrats' view: meeting the people's needs in wise ways inside an objective picture of the whole.

Thursday, September 6, 2018

Upkeeping moral in important places

Important places that serve a large group, like bank and medias, often have also big groups or even masses of people who would like to have such position, and that causes trouble, lots of criminal intentions tempting people. But typically big pressure is easy to handle by ging in in wise ways. It may be that the people's dreams are not wise and not possible, at least not possible for all, but that is just why the giving in has to be made in wise ways, and that is why there need to be just the skilled professionals working there and handling the thing so that the end result is benefical to just about all or even tyo all. Typically people who want something shortsighted want it based on some more narrowgroup's interest and point of viewm so that something which sounds much smaller would satisfy them even better. Often when someone wants just oppose something civilized it is that they are themselves stuck to habitual certain kind of life and the thing that they oppose is outside it's sphere of attention or much more responsible than their own not so skilled position. So they would be satisfied with more narrow life and smaller media that uses their own group's viewpoint to them amd recogozes their own position smakll enough.

Sunday, August 12, 2018

It is not always good to aim to know everything

My momn sometime said when there was talk about famous old Finnish artists that the wife Venny Soldan-Brofeldt of a famous Finnish writer Juhani Aho is very important because her name brings to mind roughly the words "who now - soldier, brother/countryman died in war" and many young men are very interested to know who dies in a war and who attacks. But the image in mind one gets from her is not of military strenght but of things gone ashtray: maybe she got the knowledge by allying with enemies, so that it had no military usefulness. Also, many liars would like to have such position, to be a  person with such a name,so that it isn'tr a good source of information.
Generally,all knowledge isn't good to have,since often the price becomes too high. You get to know a lot if you are a kind of copy of the other one, but so you lose your own viewpoint, your own wisdom, your own freedom. Likewise, is you oppose something, it is because ity somehow lessens your possibilities to your kind of life you think, so changing to a copy of the other one does not make your life better but instead smallens the room for such. Such is of course not true when the other culture or supposed enemy or victim of yours is wiser than you and ha´s more wisdomof life, if which you could learn good life, like is the situation of Finns: Finland has wisdom of healthy ways of living and arranging a society, high skillstoo, but that is different frommilitary spying. Spies often like to tell tales tro get money and respect,so they often like to create a big mess like an actor, and do not cure things with the information they offer. If the enemy is less wise than you, you lose a lot of strenght and possibilities for good life in the society in your own country by copying him/her/that culture, and that is typically the pitfal young boys fall into. What they should know is about strenght and wise tactics,and those go via investing in health in everything, in healthy ways of doing things, for example that defending a countrey should be done in ways that are good for a country instead of ruining the country, and that practising ought to handle those things which bring skills and do not ruin the thing in question.
About learning useful Finnish skills http://Finnishskills.blogspot.fi
Finnish ways of being social give typically much more information about others and other cultures, even with less contact, than such throwing oneself at the mercy of others, and Finnish ways of being social and at the smae time looking from the point of view of the sssocietybring much more wisdom and strenght, a better position.
An enemy is not like another enemy, all countries and cultures are different, with the other countries in the same climate it is easiest to symphatize since there is something alike in living conditions. Far away countries and cultures may look tempting but often they lack our culture's basic good sides that are here present in everything, but faraway cultures too may be widely different for example civilized Asian versus complete lack of moral and rationality in Africa.
If the problem is that a young boy does not yet know what is an enemy, why would someone be called an enemy, and yet is aiming to be a soldier commanded to a war, propably he should instead practise skills for life, to be a healthy ibdividual in a healthy society, and to start with to be a pacifist and then only later after having learned about life, cultures, societies, different times,about different times in one's own life and their level of wisdom, maybe then across years he could learn if there is anything that in his opinion needs to be defended against. Bearing all hardship isn't the point since such makes lives miserable, loses the good sides of the modern world, instead healthy ways to grow in trenght and wisdom often bring a good understanding as one ages.


Tuesday, June 19, 2018

The position of each person in the world

All people do not understand that also social contacts and social life are parts of the world. So what there are rules aboutcorrect behaviour in the world, apply also to all social contacts! Always peopledo not follow that good moral, but that is a problem, a malfunction and not some separate right of them.
There is a right place for each person in the world. In that they affect the world toward good, to a flourishing fair life in what comes to their effect. And they have a good life at that place in the world and in hierargies. Lower they are somewhat dimmed, not affecting as much toward good as they would in their right position. Higher than that their effect just goes ashtray and they meet lots of oppisition, end up in fights.
Also social endeavours are counted in things for which one needs enough skills and moral before they are allowed, for example opposing some professional work may need an understanding of the world and good enough behaviour. On the other hand, so need those professions too but typically even more or then they must stick to being just subordinates of those who understand the world and carry respensibility about the world.

Friday, June 15, 2018

Objective feedback makes the society work like market economy's idea is

Often people give different feedback to different people, to each one something like what the person is like, hiw she or he behaves right then and usually, taking their cunning plans into account too and not believing in lies. In some this causes a rebellion. They would like to redirect the feedback to some person who in their eyes is like that in style or just it's opposite which they often consiuder defenceless or longing for such. But it is important that each person would get feedback just about their own behaviour, values etc, since so they can themselves see what they are creating into the world. One can so also compare the different options and tactics in the society, which makes the society work a little bit like the idea in market economies is. But that means treating each person fairly, not presupposing some rigid hierarchy of likings, dislikings etc.

Wednesday, March 28, 2018

Correcting if some part of the society is opposite of what is the idea in having it

Sometimes rigid rules are difficult to follow and difficult to put to practise. And so some parts of the society may in practise be quite opposite to what they ought to be, for example the police for crimes instead of opposing them. This is often at least partly a question of the skill level of the people in that profession and of the environment. Very basic things are easier to understand, at least if one has studied them, and so they more often et right. On the other hand more complex advanced things may be so full of dependencies on this and that, that poeple do not get right what is the idea in the goal, and so the task has become impossible or goes in practise wrong. Like for exampe if the police is too rule like, just about all forces in the society pulling to other directions, it is then much more difficult to put to practise than just going through the grounds for basic arrangements in common sense objective conversations that understand about life. But very basic isn't the same as very stupid, since with more skill one can find more common sense like answers.
Another thing to take into account is the motivcation of the workers: what kind of jobs would they be suited to? And what country they long for, which country's ways and values they seek to follow and advance in the environment?

Sunday, March 4, 2018

An actor is not in safety

Usually in a society things run quite ordinary routes and if something goes wrong, the people around try to correct things back to normal, back to well. But that demands that they can notice the situation. Often problems are caused by criminals, and so it matters a lot that wehn you are deep in trouble no-one manages to make you look perfectly fine. That is so for roughly honest people without much acting skills, but for actors with high skill the safety net is lacking since they can be pressured to acting that all is well, and so the ordinary safety nets and emergency helps of the society do not come to question, and so an actor can be very miserable, for example a dug addict in addition to other problems. Yet one could always comform to well behaving ways and good will, kind of follow the ways of the rest of the society, if one is an ordinary person and does not want to reveal everything about oneself, but so one would be protected somewhat like one maybe supposes that an actor would be - well, but an actor isn't, since mostly there are quite many criminally inclined and foreign intersts around.

Tuesday, January 16, 2018

Protecting press

Since the beginning of November last year, has our local countryside town's newspaper's journalists disappeared and replaced by actors who are not interested in the subjects they write about but who are very interested in being in sight and maybe messing how the society is run. As far as I know, such usually does not happen in Finland but maybe happens abroad. I got the idea that the main motivation is being in sight, in important places, replacing valued people. Such seems to happen when ordinary people are not sincere but kind of pretending or acting, so that they are kind of like actors deeds, and so an actor thinks that that is all that the position is about. So it is likely to happen in places where people tend to act a lot. And especially if the contents, the idea in that kind of work and it's motivation are not emphasized. Whoever makes the newspaper ought to be skilled in the things they write about and not a young unexperienced person. They also should have those things in their liuves, be sincerely intewrested in them and not in entirely differemt things in that context. Being famous or in sight is a work to be done with skill, not some position in which to do something else. People value the person in the position for what they learn from him or her. Only mistakes in communication, not real position, come from person without teaching skills being in such position.

Tuesday, November 14, 2017

Politics, rigid thought forms, hierargies, skill and democracy

I do not know so much of politics, but it seems that in the old times when Finladn was young, there were more thoughts and ideals leading and nowadays some tv shows with lied looks, not so much sincere facts. his seems to connect with foreigners wanting to learn about Finland arranging things peacefully, and so foreign errors made visible in the media, ruining Finnish ways. And it seems to connect with too rigid forms overruling the freedomof individuals of so the freedom of the people. Politics seeks to be accessible for an as wide audience of Finnish adults as possible, partly for kids too. That means that some normal, often repeated thought and values of the parties are simple and simple in form and try to apply to many things at once. Because they are simple, some good speakers for them are not at all intelligent, more like discussing social people taking opart in everyday life, seeing this and that point as they are told about them and repeating them later. This simplicity is needed in speaking for crowds and media. But it shoudl be also outspokenness in grounds for values, in the pictures of the world used, and not just empty words repeated. For the situations where there aren't so many lsiteners at the same time or when oneassociates with one group only like with some association and it's members, one can then use a more intelligent approach, discuss thing more at lenght, yet not making it a separate endeavour like a mindless idiot would do.
Poltics is also influenced by the need of running a demicracy in the middle of foreign influencies, which may be disguised as the influencues of big companies etc. Foreign countries lack Finnish ground for Finnish decisions, so one task of polityics is to go through the different ground for political decisions in the media and also in smaller circles, to teach them. So politics is a discussion also in thsi sense. Often foreigners are interested in economical benefit. To create economical benefit the wholes in the society which create that benefit ought to be well kept, i.e. whole, well arranged, well working, not exhausting the gorund for such benefit in the future, the society running smoothly at that place, getting support from the other parts of the society and from the workers, using a good understanding in these and so giving the workers and their families also a good life, a good society to live in. This kind of arrangements are a good cultural influence from Finland to abroad, but they should not be copied detailedly but instead their basci grounds understood and new arrangements made in each country by thinking these things through in their country, climate, culture, national character, values of people about what life shoudl be like, what they bother about in their society, what isgood for them, how is a good wuise future quaranteed for the soceity etc. This is not so difficult to think through as it might appear. Just think of one individual or type of individuals in time:why are they wuilling to go to work, what kind of benefits they want, what kind of job they like and how well would they take care of it, what is it's value in the society, how much wage ought they get to get a good life and what other arrangements and possibilities in the society they need, want, which things are good for them and which unwise and ought to be avoided. And so what a good society be like in that climate. What would it bother about, what would it follow, how skilled would it be, what is know about the long time endurancy of such cultural features and benefits, what should they avoid and how they keep way from ruining such things, which areas of life would they specialize into, besatisfied with and who would be eager,s killed and responsible enough to care for the rest and how would the society follow such arrangements, their needs and their need for distance.

Basics of a well working society

A well working society is build on what the people are like, not on the goverment etc. Kind of what the people in their laziness do, that they continue on their old tracks that they are comfortable with, that they learn new things in areas of interest to them and do not bother about everything. So an African does not get a well working African society by travelling to Europe to learn from the European societies well functioning ways and problem solving skills. Insteadan African village has a well working well kept water well, if that is a central value for all the people in that area, if they value a good well highly enough, and if they have the sufficient skills for that in that place and culture. If they do not have the motivation, the well is likely to get spoiled. If most have a high motivation but some want to spoil the well, thoise with a high motivation kill the sabotagers, and so they still have a well working well for drinking water. Also if they traditionally did not have a good well but with extra skill they nowadays could have it and they npwadays and in the future have a high motivation for the well, they are likely to invest in things and skills that make it possible for them to learn the skills for making and maintaining well the well.

Saturday, November 4, 2017

Comparing the position sof different professions

In siciences there is a clear hierarchy of who has npticed how much. The technocal, engineering oriented notice the least. The natural sciences have objective thinking skills but largely memorized. Philosophy adds a wider view and more individual skills in objective thinking. Arts and religion seem to rise aboeve them but their position isn'ty as onefold but more likely a different position for each individual, since some individuals have basic skills lacking.

Tuesday, October 10, 2017

Of women's and men's clishee like position and their clishee like rights

Especially in school age many have misunderstandings and misestimates about women's and men's rights and obligations. Women and men are usually different but not all women alike each other. So women and men have typical rights and obligations which many take as given, but which in fact have grounds on how they behave and what they wish for. So each right is conditional, even if it is a typical right of that gender. Women's rights often are like using well cultivated things in the society, meant for good life, but they are on the condition that you yourself cultivate such thinsg faurly. Men's rights are often of the type that the less able ought to be helped, i.e. adviced by the older ones, professionals etc and given help. They are on teh condition that he does not misuse such differencies in power, skill,position etc, and that he fairly does his share of the obligations. Men and boys often have rights based on being soldier like or in doing healthy good quality, but such rights demand that they use soldier like characteristics in defence of the good of the society, and not against it, and that they really do things in healthy spirit. Women have often rights to influence the lives of others, but those presuppose that one ought to influence with wisdom, wosdom of life, morally and with good will.

Tuesday, October 3, 2017

Pacifism, civilized ways and the need for an army

It is very common that countries have a well organized civil society plus military service for men. Boys do not always understand how these connect. And especially they do not understand what to think of pacifism, women, moral and evil in these matters from the point of view of c´military service.
Countries have armies. Armies protect the countries and support their interests. That is different from evil running free. Evil means things harmful to the society, so that it is a thing to oppose. Evil does not mean soldiers' virtues, strenght, military power, convincing imago etc which are soldiers' characteristics to aim at. Things are called good because they are useful, good for some purpose. That is why these matters connect to good versus evil.
The rules and practises of the civil society build something for the society, a good society to live in, with a good promising future in the world as we know it. Moral rules seek to prevent from breaking these build things. That is why they sound pacifist. But all the world does not belong to the same group, so that one needs to defend them also from outsiders ruining them, which is what an army is needed for. So at the same time as one tries to avoid breaking things valued in the civil society, at the same time one build strenghts and skills for being able in soldier like things, for being able to defend good life and a good future. Joining together to large grouos greates strenght, and so this defendng goes best in big allegiancies, like the country and it's army, it's allies too.

Monday, August 7, 2017

One can help the more able

Some cultivate the view that one cannot help more intelligent, more skilled and more moral ones than what one oneself is. But that is not at all so. Whenever in human contacts or in groups, it matters a lot what the others are like and how they behave. Like if you are on a trip, it matters that also the children can walk some distancies by themselves. Or hat all carry their part of the things taken along.. And that they offer information. And that they do not attack against moral. That they participate in discussions with the intention to understand, and learn, and take those things morally into account in practise. Also if it a question of protection,one can well protect the more able, since two is usually a bigger opponent than just one, and three is even bigger. And taking part even though not fighting is better than betraying. Behaving in civilized ways it is not so big difference between people of different caliber. Interfering with the lives or responsibilities of others is a different things than helping and doing one's part. I wonder how one can be so mistaken to think that one should interfere even if one does not understand differencies like these?

Sunday, July 30, 2017

Moral hierargies

Some more stupid or less moral people think that they are low in a hierargy of the society and so do not need to carry responsibility over their actions. But that is not so. Living in a society their deeds do affect, regardless of whether it was planned to have such effects or not, regardless if it was a social deed or something connected to some fact or value. Deeds tend to have side effects, even major effects on other people with different needs than the person doing the deed. So all need to carry responsibility. One way to carry responsibility is to talk to those who cause disasters to others and teach them or guide them socially. It is not a hierargy, it is just a question of skills and of caring for good life in the society, now and in the future, also for different types of persons than oneself. The arrangements and rules in a society are made on a general levl, so that they make life possibilities godd for all types of people by following the same rule. Regardless of whether one is stupid or not wanting to support some area of life or some style, one is oblidged to carry responsibility of how one affects the society and so also to follow it's wise rules. One common way to carry such responsibility is to avoid affecting major matters of the society and of other persons' lives, and to cooperate socially, and to leave the matters of the society to be decided by civilized wisdom, wisely of course.

Friday, June 30, 2017

Advices for white colour

I have a white dog and a brown one (apricot). It appears that the white colour is much more difficult to bear than brown.
White can mean diligency, cleanness and moral. Even though moral means often that things are diligently done, such diligency is tiring, and so in practise white is somethiung that you achieve, a characteristic of things done, and not the whole picture, which shuld be livelier: healthy happy colours mixed in, and not the ground that you start from, which should be more like everyday ife, for example the practical brown and some healthy happy colours mixed in. So you have more energy and the job is less tirying,s ince it is juts some points every now and then and not something to be done all the time.
For moral you need common sense, for which is ok my thinking course at http://quickerlearning.blogspot.fi which quickly explained is looking at a landscaope while observing the structures in it. Together with that and healthy psirit, the easiest forms of moral might be rationally grounded moral: we build somehow useful things in the society, see http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2013/04/rationally-grounded-moral.html , and therule "Live and let others life", see http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2012/10/live-and-let-others-live.html . For animals the picture of a horse running free in an arch in the latter, is nicest, easiest and most well working: kind of like trees growing in a forest patch: each individual, each living a fullf illing life and in harmony with the rest, not messing with their lives.


Another common type of moral is to think of the world at large, as one huge landscape like picture with the future of the world too, and care for the future generations, wish well for them and care the worldto a better state because of that every time that one meets an important questioon in one's life.

Tuesday, May 30, 2017

Safety in government jobs with position

"Dear Sirs,
Something which can delay supreme court nomination is lack of safety
and conflicts about what course the court should take. So what brings
safety to government officials?
Rationally grounded moral makes arrangements understandable also to
the selfish individuals and groups, see
http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2013/04/rationally-grounded-moral.html
Basic view of bureaucrats is that bureaucracy serves to meet people's
needs fairly and according to common sense witha picture of the whole
and civilized wisdom.
Different professions gain safety if they are according to people's
wishes what they with wisdom wish the officials etc to be like. Like
singers should have wisdom of life, police behave according to common
sense and people's views on what kind of moral is ´good to have in a
society, etc.
The Finnish behaviour rule
http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2012/10/live-and-let-others-live.html
solves conflicts between individuals, groups and countries. It also
makes government agreed about and law too, if it is placed above them
according to common sense, wisdom and wisdom of life, with a healthy
spirit.
Maybe also
http://healthilymoral.blogspot.fi/2011/08/world-is-of-love.html . ,
http://healthilymoral.blogspot.fi/2016/07/a-sense-of-different-areas-of-life-as.html
and http://healthilymoral.blogspot.fi/2016/09/why-emperors-maybe-stayed-in-power.html
"

Maybe also http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2015/11/healthy-ways-of-living.html


9. July 2018   See also http://talesfromforest.blogspot.com/2017/08/about-kalevala.html