Position in hierargy is not the same as benefit

Often actors and some criminally inclined think that it would be benefical for them to replace high officials and people in high position by actors and/or exercise pressure on the real persons in positions. But position is just a jib. It exists solely to get the job done. It's reputation comes from the high quality of the work done by the people usually in such a job or by famous such people. If a position would include lots of rights or priviledges without checking well that they are not used to wrong purposes, such positions would deteriorate to crime and would be only harmful to the country. So a high position ought to have just a job, done with good professional skill and civilized wisdom, and no extra rights or priviledges.
Even for a criminal, a high position does not necessarily mean benefit, since high positions are windy places: there are very many people who would want such benefits for themselves or such positions in decisions. Also, since jobs exist to get things done, giving those jobs to skilled persons motivated fro taking well care of the job at hand, would give all the benefit from that job done to the society, and doing so with all jobs would giuve an enermous benefit compared to jobs at wrong hands. So as an ordinary citizen you can so gain more than as a criminal tsealing power and benefit.