Advices for white colour

I have a white dog and a brown one (apricot). It appears that the white colour is much more difficult to bear than brown.
White can mean diligency, cleanness and moral. Even though moral means often that things are diligently done, such diligency is tiring, and so in practise white is somethiung that you achieve, a characteristic of things done, and not the whole picture, which shuld be livelier: healthy happy colours mixed in, and not the ground that you start from, which should be more like everyday ife, for example the practical brown and some healthy happy colours mixed in. So you have more energy and the job is less tirying,s ince it is juts some points every now and then and not something to be done all the time.
For moral you need common sense, for which is ok my thinking course at http://quickerlearning.blogspot.fi which quickly explained is looking at a landscaope while observing the structures in it. Together with that and healthy psirit, the easiest forms of moral might be rationally grounded moral: we build somehow useful things in the society, see http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2013/04/rationally-grounded-moral.html , and therule "Live and let others life", see http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2012/10/live-and-let-others-live.html . For animals the picture of a horse running free in an arch in the latter, is nicest, easiest and most well working: kind of like trees growing in a forest patch: each individual, each living a fullf illing life and in harmony with the rest, not messing with their lives.

Another common type of moral is to think of the world at large, as one huge landscape like picture with the future of the world too, and care for the future generations, wish well for them and care the worldto a better state because of that every time that one meets an important questioon in one's life.

Safety in government jobs with position

"Dear Sirs,
Something which can delay supreme court nomination is lack of safety
and conflicts about what course the court should take. So what brings
safety to government officials?
Rationally grounded moral makes arrangements understandable also to
the selfish individuals and groups, see
http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2013/04/rationally-grounded-moral.html
Basic view of bureaucrats is that bureaucracy serves to meet people's
needs fairly and according to common sense witha picture of the whole
and civilized wisdom.
Different professions gain safety if they are according to people's
wishes what they with wisdom wish the officials etc to be like. Like
singers should have wisdom of life, police behave according to common
sense and people's views on what kind of moral is ´good to have in a
society, etc.
The Finnish behaviour rule
http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2012/10/live-and-let-others-live.html
solves conflicts between individuals, groups and countries. It also
makes government agreed about and law too, if it is placed above them
according to common sense, wisdom and wisdom of life, with a healthy
spirit.
Maybe also
http://healthilymoral.blogspot.fi/2011/08/world-is-of-love.html . ,
http://healthilymoral.blogspot.fi/2016/07/a-sense-of-different-areas-of-life-as.html
and http://healthilymoral.blogspot.fi/2016/09/why-emperors-maybe-stayed-in-power.html
"

Maybe also http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2015/11/healthy-ways-of-living.html


9. July 2018   See also http://talesfromforest.blogspot.com/2017/08/about-kalevala.html

15. March 2019   About placing the rule "Live and let others live" (i.e. it is ok to be selfish in ways positive for happy life but not to disturb the lives of others except fairly is ok - Think of the trees in a park: each one has it's branches sovereignly but does not disturb the braches of others.) above law. Sin ce the rule is ok but kind of thinking centered and does not allow all possible choices, it might be good to start in a quite (but not overly, I guess) orderly, rationally inclined way, and then let the situation open to this kidn of aloowing view that is positive for happy life.
I do not know about punishments, but could one in one's mind think of different choices, maybe far apart to make it easy in the beginning, and check what the end results affect compared to this rule: what would be the best working society, easy to agree about, giving good life & freedom to all? 

28th of March 2020  The rule "Live and let other live" could help also polices' work if used above law but explained with common sense and with the laws too.

Position in hierargy is not the same as benefit

Often actors and some criminally inclined think that it would be benefical for them to replace high officials and people in high position by actors and/or exercise pressure on the real persons in positions. But position is just a jib. It exists solely to get the job done. It's reputation comes from the high quality of the work done by the people usually in such a job or by famous such people. If a position would include lots of rights or priviledges without checking well that they are not used to wrong purposes, such positions would deteriorate to crime and would be only harmful to the country. So a high position ought to have just a job, done with good professional skill and civilized wisdom, and no extra rights or priviledges.
Even for a criminal, a high position does not necessarily mean benefit, since high positions are windy places: there are very many people who would want such benefits for themselves or such positions in decisions. Also, since jobs exist to get things done, giving those jobs to skilled persons motivated fro taking well care of the job at hand, would give all the benefit from that job done to the society, and doing so with all jobs would giuve an enermous benefit compared to jobs at wrong hands. So as an ordinary citizen you can so gain more than as a criminal tsealing power and benefit.

Pressure and moral

Selfishness-based moral means that one can behave morally even under pressure, if the group pressuring is selfish and listens to real rationality. About this type of moral see http://paratiisiteoria.blogspot.fi/2013/09/paratiisissa-on-kaarme.html under the Finnish text an English quotation from my book, and my book there at the first text of the blog by the link.

Big things and safety

If one would not know how to handle things, very many jobs would appear impossible. For example shops handling money, or a bank, or positions of fame or politics, etc. But as they are largely professions, they take things piece by piece small enough that they can handle them well. And the civilized wisdom of the rest of the society helps them in that.
I do not know how these professions handle things, but based on my experience of writing to the internet, I would say that it isn't just writing, and it isn't just knowing, but it is something which has influence if it is good quality and otherwise it drops away in competition. Like if you have a good bank or a lousy one, so which one gets the money fromordinary customers. So you get position according to your skills, or you drown in a mess if you try to take somebody else's position. When you have enough skill for the task at hand, things look quite ordinary in your eyes and often there isn't such a great variety of options but just some things to taker care of with your good quality skills. As we age, if we all the time try to learn about life, we learn more sides of each things we are interested in, learning across the years to solve things we first failed in. So a more skilled one often can solve problems that others fail in. So it matters a lot to hire just the workers who have lots of skills and a sincere interest in the area.
If some things are too large to handle, cut them to many small parts and give those parts maybe to a large group of people. Some things also are too big for some of those who would like to benefit from them criminally: if you stéal a thousand euros, that is just extra money for you, but if you steal a million euros, you are likely to get murdered because of the money. So with large sums, maybe one could divert the attention of some part of the criminals to much smaller sums maybe available. And the biggest money would then be for the biggest players, which are groups with work ethics, rationality, civilized ways etc, so that rational grounds matter and there can be agreement of what is good even if the parties appear competitors and separate. Like for examle building the groundwork for a hig level of economical success in a nation or a larger area: kind of basuic thriuths that the oparticipants agree about and base their lives on.

Interests and skills instead of power

"120. People's skill levels affect how many things they can well do at the same time and how quickly they get those things done and how well they succeed in them. The slow witted typically do something else at the same time, so they need lots of concentration and many attempts to succeed in even ordinary tasks, for example they think of food in the stomach or keep their body very rigidly.
For one to learn skills, one needs to pay attention to what was the idea in that skills, what it consists of and which ways of doing are best suited for it. The most slow learning try to copy via sexuality or acting or by keepin g company, very détailedly the social atmosphere of the more skilled one, but that just disturbs skills. Instead one should keep a longer distance and watck detailedly what the skilled one does, and do those things oneself, without being overly close. About problems that the wise do not usually fall into, teh less skilled have no right to demand the skilled to be models of how to fall into them and then rise again, but instead the less skilled should heed advices about the subject, usually ordinary basic advices about the subject and about those kind of things in the world and about life generally, since biggest problems have to be avoided in advance, always.
Typically people do only a few thinsg at a time. For example if someone sing, they think of the song's atmosphere, of music, of not disturbing neighbours, of music hobbies and of wisdom of songs. So they are kind of concentrated to music subject. So if one is interested in who should have power over what, one can via the rule "Live and let others live", i.e. It is ok to be selfish in ways positive for happy life but not to disturb the lives of others, one can with the help of this rule say that the person singing usually, almost always, ought to be allowed to sing. But on the other hand not to interfere in affairs that he/she is not just now taking care of. Similarly with other subjects. It is ok to care for them, in ways piositive for happy life in the society and in the world, but not to disturb such possibilities, which must be estimated wisely. For example someone may build possibilities for music hobbies, that is often a job or a hobby in music. Likewise in other subjects: the skilled one who value it take care of it. On the other hand the stupid usually should be allowed to do things by themselves to learn about life and skill but not to mess with the lives of others or the affairs of the society. So it often seems that there is no question of power unless there is someone with too little skill or not valuing the things in question enough, messing along. So the question of power seems to connect to family emebers influencing things because they are close to a person who values such things in life. Otherwise, and maybe even in family relations, things are quite clear with the rule "Live and let others live"."
http://feelingcomputers.blogspot.fi

About armies' looks

The leadership of Finnish army has often or traditionally been Swedish. That is absurd, since Finns have negotiation skills well suited for Finns, so a more peaceful result would have been to have an all-Finnish leadership of Finnish army. Finnish men also copy army like ways. It is absurd for them to copy Swedish style since their own skills are Finnish and well suited for just Finnish life and Finnish ways of handliung things. It is generally important to look roughly with the same kind of understanding and the same level of intelligence as one really honesty has, because so all others all the time talk in ways that you can well understand and they talk to your own motivation, so you learn all the time and benefit greatly. If you are skilled, it is nice to get respect and position that you fairly deserve. If you are not at all skilled but don't lie to be any more skilled than you really are, you learn all the time, and you do not look like a betrayal but like a good honest attempt in things that others too value. More stupid ones are often with more basic questions of life, so others kind of find them symphatetical. There are different levels of understanding in each: one is to understand well by oneself and to do on one's own, another is to have read and roughly followed through but not able to think such on one's own even afterwards, and a third is to not to understand but to follow authorities, for example priests. But between nations there are also other differencies: travellers find a different climate, different ways, different ways of being social and running the society, different rythm etc, so they kind of appear more stupid than what they in fact are when they are in their own country.Russians in Siberia copy froma cademical while Asians copy from highly respected masters of different skills, so it may be that Siberians are less intelligent that Asians while they on the other hand have more freedom than the Asians, like more average people typically have compared to highly educated. who do not get likewise followed in their own thughts. People in more eastern countries live the evening while western live the morning or day, so they have more evening like characteristics and appear more thoughtless, more leisurely, more freetime like. Trust is often felt toward the one who is more skilled and responsible, while instictual irrational trust is felt to the opposite direction: toward those who do not take care of things going well at all and so rely on others to take care of things. People in more southern and warmer areas typically confuse northern people to be like people in cooled indoors or like their own countrymen who have travelled to the cooler  or colder countries but who are not adapted to the northern climate.If you do a service to other countries in a way typical to your own country's culture, then others learn or otherwise benefit from it and so they are more in tune with your own culture, with it's ways, and so your culture has gained more influence in the world, in a way that it fairly deserves.

African lack of moral

African weather brings short-sightedness if one is not skilled in living with the heat. One things which affects a lot is what kind of food one eats and when. As far as I know, a good type of meal fitted for living wisely with the weathers, helps already even once a month but much more if eaten daily. At least in Finnish climate a meal of fish, rise and cooked vegetables brings a better touch of living wisely with the weathers. The Finnish climate is very different, almost arctic, but summer time daytime temperatures on hot days may rise to as high as roughly 30C, so just in case that it helps abroad, Finnish advices about living wisely the summer: http://healthynaturalwaysofliving.blogspot.fi/2017/02/living-wisely-summer.html

Often people are short-sigheted when their professional and other forefigures are much less intelligent than they are. So finding widely more skilled forefigures would help a lot. For example small wild birds may be more intelligent tahn apes and some apes more intelligent and farseeing than other apes.
In addition one needs civilized wisdom about what is a good way to live in a society, see http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2012/10/live-and-let-others-live.html and http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2013/04/rationally-grounded-moral.html and about healthy ways of living and wisdom of life http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2015/11/healthy-ways-of-living.html .
Intelligece one can learn from my blogs http://quickerlearning.blogspot.fi and http://pikakoulu.blogspot.fi plus from video playlists at http://www.youtube.com/khtervola .

* * *
(I was left wondering about African meals. Could one try different dishes and find out what makes one feel well and how often it is good to eat so in the local climate and with some type of activity & strain during the day? Would an evening snack of some fresh vegetables sallad, (maybe  a wineberry(??)) and a piece of a Carelian pie make one sleep well?)

About trying to guide people toward moral

It often happens for beginners who know only one approach to some questions in life, that they try to force others into accepting thier own views. But there are many areas of life. As people get more experience in life, they learn skills and talents in new areas of life from those who have such skills as their hobby or job. So they often have many approaches available fro each type of question. And so, if one tries to force them to one answer, they often resist, thinking that their own answer is better suited for them. So what is moral and what is not is a question that needs skills, open-mindedness toward other kinds of answers and a view of how the society works and what is needed in the society for things to turen out well. So an idea of who is how skilled in which areas of life, could settle disputes about whom to aloow freedoms and whom to allow decides for the group. Often varied answers by different people offer a well working choise for the group.

When someone errs to oppose moral quite strongly, it often is a questions of what is nonsese and what is not or of what was forcing, what was ordinary talk and what was mildly refusing to have an opinion. For suc too a better idea about who is how skilled in what, wouldgive better working communication. (http://pikakoulu.blogspot.fi ). About how much one can command and what is too far going, to that works well the rule "Live and let others live!" i.e. it is ok for all to be selfish in ways positive for happy life but not to mess with the lives of others, except fairly. One must demand this rule also toward and between others and not just with you with the person you conversate with. See http://Finnishskills.blogspot.fi . In the same blog also about healthy ways of living: If your suggestions is not good in some respect, it likely gets opposed, but if it works well for all, it is much more likely to be accepted and supported.

People who are considered to be with a lack of understanding, often confuse adices from different sources, kind of one talking one way of talking and another with another way of talking and other subjects too but they confuse them to be the same things and so produce nonsense from which they are blaimed. Relying more in common sense would help. One shoudl also pay somewhat more attention to who said the thing in question, not to memorize it as words only but as something said by someone specialized in certain area of life and with certain ways of thinking and level of skill in such and certain level of skill in other things. So the things said have only so much understanding and only about certain areas of life. What someone else said was with a certain leel of success in that area of life and certain amount of certainty in things at large. So please keep these things in your mind too as a landcspe, and your own understanding, the things at hand etc, and not just the words said.

People adapt to the culture and climate they were raised in, so that even abroad they tend to suggest that things should be guided like they were guided in their original homeland and culture. So if some Arab or whoever seems dangerously out of control and criminal, should one check if she/he is from another continent than you thought her/him to be from?Like Arab maybe African, some work oriented from Asia, etc.

Often especially young people confuse their environment talking about their own interests and values and about the importance of their place in the world, into believing that they themselves should invest in just those skills and areas of life even at the cost of their own profession and values. But it is not so. People just need to express their iews about things they like and value. It is not an obligation fro others, it is not even advice since it supposes that you are similarly inclined person. The rule "Live and let others live!" gives you room to follow your own likings even if others do not agree about their value.

Sexuality

In Finland sexuality is a love affair: people choose freely whom they love and with whom they want to get married and start a family. They also choose freely is they do not want to associate with someone or be sexual with someone. That is good life and makes things work out well. The rule "Live and let others live!" (which means that it is ok to be selfish but not to mess with the lives of others, except fairly interfering with others is ok) makes things work out well and gives freedom.

But in some other countruies people either aren't so free, so skilled, they have a different view on love in their enviroment, or they do not have enough contacts. So they end up with less good arrangements which though are said to have the good sides of love affairs.

http://yksinaisille.blogspot.fi/2012/03/advice-for-dating-and-finding-new.html
http://yksinaisille.blogspot.fi/2012/03/advice-on-creating-charm.html
http://yksinaisille.blogspot.fi/2012/03/build-perfect-relationship.html

Dark or light?

As one via age  learns new skills, one first as a kid becomes a member of the adult's world, then later  truly a part of it, then somewhat too skilled for some tasks, then too skilled for many to communicate with, then not understood. Likewise one learns to solve problems in life and of the world, and so later on one has more answers and more skilled style, but less understood anymore. So at first one maybe were for tough realism as a kid, kind of dark, then later average, then light, then out of sight, then dark or light or whatever when one part of the time succeeds in communicating answers found and part of the time is too different to be understood right. So from communication one changes to out of tune but full of answers - finds religion, art, upbringing of the next generation, etc.

On the other hand some try to start from the difficult end and so they lack quality, kind of full of lies. Or someone skilled loses touch with daily chores and so loses basic skills which bring quality. And both gorups some tend to encourage to tasks which require great skill. So it goes ashtray.

All people may have the same building parts, kind of rational, kind of caring for things they consider impirtant. But all do not stick to the level they know well and care about, but mess with the wider world, and so things go ashtray. Or they are social unobjectively in questions that should be parts of the society, of civilized ways and not of social life and personal choises.

Moraali käy yli sairaiden yms hoitamisen oikeuden * Moralis more important than nursing

Minua ihmetyttää tuo, onko hoitoalojen ammattilaisille, poliisille ym ihmisille selvä tuo, että mitä moraali sanoo siitä, kuka saa hoitaa ketä ja että mitä saa määrätä ja mitä ei. Yleensä kai hoitoalan ihminen haluaisi mielellään hoitaa jotakin presidentin tapaista esim. henkilöä, jolla on jokin virka, taito tai vaikutusvalta, ja ajattelisi siitä saavansa etua itselleen, lähinnä vaikutusvaltaa ja rahallista hyötyä kai ja pelottelumahdollisuuden. Mutta moraalin näkövinkkelistä on niin, että kullakin ihmisellä on vastuuntuntonsa määrä, miten laajalti kantaa asioista ja ihmisistä vastuuta, ja mikä taas jää tuon yksilön vastuuntuntoisuuden ulkopuolelle, huolehtimatta, sekä lisäksi on taitojen määrä, esim. ymmärrys ja taidot kullakin elämänalueella sekä havaintokyky ja havaintovarmuus sen osana. Hoitohenkilökunta ei saisi päättää mistään laajemmasta kuin mistä kantaa vastuuta, siis esim. vain hoitotyöstä vastuuta kantava ei saisi päättää presidentin tai muunkaan itseään laajemmalti vastuuta kantavan asioista mitään, vaan vastuuntuntoisen olisi itse saatav päättää kaikki, jottei vaikutuksia mihinkään laajempiin kysymyksiin tulisi ties miten pahaatekeviltä tai huolehdittavat asiat hunningolle jättäviltä. Yleensä se, joka ei ole kiinnostunut jostakin aiheesta, teloo sen kuin tökerö pahoipitelijä, jos siihen puuttuu, kuin mikä lie huonontyyppinen diktaattori, jonka käsissä maan asiat menevät huonosti. Sen sijaan henkilö, joka huolehtii jostakin alueesta hyvin, yleensä antaa sen ihmisten olla ihan vapaasti, järjestääpähän vain jonkin tervehenkisesti toiumivan kätevän avun johonkin yleisesti toivottuun hyväätekevään.

Se, että joku on hierargiassa korkealla ei merkitse, ettei hänen kanssaan noudatettaisi mitään pelisääntöjä, vaan heidänkin kanssaan on oltava moraalinen ja tervejärkinen sekä tervehenkinen.
Esim. jos joku on moraalisempi kuin mitä laki edellyttäisi ja hyvällä ymmärryksellä varustettu, niin ehkä joku sanoo hänen olevan lain yläpuolella mutta se siis merkitsee, että hänen kanssaan noudatetaan lakia täydesti paitsi ehkä joustetaan siitä moraalisempaan suuntaan.

* * *
engl. translation

I am puzzled about whether people working in medicine or in nursing kidn of work, and whether police and  other peoole have been made clear what moral says about who is allowed to nurse whom and what one is allowed to command and what not. Usually people in nursing type of work would like to nurse someone like a president, who has some job position, skill or influence, and they would think taht nursing such would give them benefit, mainly influence and money benefit and propably also the ability to scare people, threaten them. But moral says that each individual has one's own amount of carrying responsibility about people and things, and what is left outside that area, not taken care of, and in addition an amount of skills, for example understanding and skills on each area of life and perception ability and how sure it is. Those in nursing type of professions should not be allowed to decide anything larger, anything more important or wider than what they themselves carry responsibility over, so for example a person caring only about nursing should not decide anything about a president or anyone else carrying wider responsibility than she herself / he himself, instead those who carry responsibility should be allowed to decide everything so as to avoid influences from evil people and from irresponsible people. Usually a person who is not interested in some subject, breaks it like as if in a fight, if one interferes with it, like a poor dictator that ruins one's country. Instead a person who cares well for some area, usually lets those people live freely and just arranges some needed generally wanted moral thing in healthy well working ways.

Someone being high in a hierargy does not mean that one should not follow any rules of game with him /her, instead with him/her one needs to behave morally and according to common sense with a picture of the whole and with healthy spirit. For example if someone is more moral than what law requires and with a good understanding, maybe someone says that he/she is above the law, but it means that with him/her one should also follow law fully but maybe be inclined to even more moral behaviour than the law is.

When there is some common sense lacking in the laws or some big problem needing correcting, correcting those may in common sense like ways like is fair go above the laws.
In Finland there is the saying "Emergency does not read the law." meaning that you can for example steal something not so important in order to help someone in an emergency.

"Live and let others live" also if there are lots of murders

The Finnish rule "Live and let others live!" means roughly that "it is ok to be selfish (in ways positive for happy life) but not to disturb the lives of others, not to cause unfairly harm to others".
So if there for example is a meadow full of insects and they eat lots of other insects and birds too eat them, one could still use this rule:
Just avoid things like torture and ruining the society and instead preferably make murders, possibly with cannibalism but with the consequences of each murder and especially of many murders and decisions to not to murder someone, taken into account morally, wishing for the good of the society and of the world in the long run..
That is just why we have armies and police, even education: to prevent worse, even if it means killing many. That is just how societies work well, protect good life by common effort. If some insect eats the corpse, I do not see how it would somehow be wrong in essence, it sounds like natural, but of course if one makes it a habit to kill without regard on whom one kills and why, just kill somebody when one is hungry, does one then kill the friendly morally ok society members while enemies of the society keep distance and that is wrong, just against the idea, against the right to kill someone, namely the enemies of good life should be killed and those creating good life in the society and in the world should be given well room to live in and safety & fair support.

Why emperors maybe stayed in power

From my blog http://aboutmytexts.blogspot.fi/2015/08/my-birthday.html
"(7. March 2016
As a child I had the last name Hari, so my name Kaisa Hari bought the associations "keisari" = emperor and "tsaari" = Russian tsar (emperor). So I took it to my task to cultivate some of the good sides that people need to have to be good or at least worthy emperors, but I did not connect that to the emperor of China but to rulers of vast areas in general. At the same time I valued grass roots democracy in the Finnish way and not kingdoms as forms of government, much less empires.)
(24. August 2016
I did not have some role or ways of behaviour emperor like, not even sometimes. Instead I thought of emperors as persons who arrange things that people in wide areas need, who find solutions to difficult problems on wide areas of the nation and do that via thinking, discussing, understanding the world, cultures, different types of people, how they interact, what they need and how to arrange such, etc. So I thought of the position of an emperor like an ordinary citizen who in some task deserves well such a high position, negotiating about the affairs of the state. But emperor managing to do that more often, solve problems, negotiate, discuss, find solutions, support good causes, know things and workings of the nation and it's neighbours well - kind of like a relative for an ordinary person, taking part in discussion about something because one has often something valuable to offer, worthy of that role and partly because he/she is often around. So I thought that emperor needs support, needs to show his/her skilledness again and again and again.)"


13. April 2019   In high position generally it is important that such jobs are done with good quality for the good of the country and the world and the people, animals etc affecvted. So high position isn't usually given very high rights to decide about things in the country and the world. Instead in important questions like whether a country enters a war, many groups of the country, possibly all, are listened to, all wise views are listened to and facts taken into account wisely and a synthesis build and that wise view formed by all wise together and by the interests of the different groups affected, decides the important things instead of someone commanding. Sometimes it is somehow good to say that someone decided the thing, but that is just figurehead like or like a journalist explaining. It is important that the best options ought to be chosen in important matters of the country, and so all wise ought to have the possibility of affecting things responsibly and with good quality, and so it is unlikely that empires would have worked well with dictator like rights of ruler, democracy is much more likely among the wise, just discussions etc and common views about what to do and those are just mentioned as if the emperor had decided building a railroad or the like infrastructure etc.
On the other hand, people in high positions or handling important questions ought to carry responsibility about those things and their effects at large, but in their personal lives they have the same freedom that so responsible, fair, wise, healthily living people with so healthy spirit as they have in these things generally have the right to. If they choose, especially if they choose extansively, something that does not fit together with such tasks, for example if they like some country that does not fit with the important tasks, then they cannot take part in the important tasks, since they have that fault, and so they are more marginal and lower in hierarchy, but on the other hand by being responsible and wise enough, they have earned personal freedom, inside civilized ways, just like others too have on the same conditions the right to.

A sense of different areas of life as interests

From my blog http://parantamisesta.blogspot.fi

A translation from Finnish:

"A282. Evil and as cures "live and let others live, sefishness, healthy spirit, pictures of wholes and a sense of different areas of life as interests
If the human nature is the same as healthy natural ages old ways of living, it is quite neutral in questions of good and evil: both tough in the hard world and also taking care of the common future to a good state. If onbe makes divisions right, one could see human action as consisting of parts of healthy ways of living with healthy spirit, and in that sense as morally ok. But if one makes large thought errors or estimates areas affected wrng, then the end result can be evil. In estimating right areas to affect the rule "Live and letr others live" is a good rule, which also leaves the individuals so much room to live in that their need to do evil things to get space to live in gets small. Healthy common sense and pictures of wholes are needed as helping aids in that.
If somebody influences all wrong, he or she is typically in a different area of life than what he or she is really interested in  and often in other size class too. It is usual that he/she claimed to be fine in every way and good enough for just about anything, but those things have been parts of the dream way of life of others and not his/her own things, which could have been found by specializing into them, but others would not have considered such fine, interesting or even valued but which for the individual would have been his/her dream life.
It is easiest to get everything right if one is with healthy spirit. That is teh ages old right answer to everything. And selfishness is a part of that but demands getting the areas affected right.

http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2015/11/healthy-ways-of-living.html"

Finding safety

"generally one can
find safety if one is in accord with the wishes of a very wide
majority of the surrounding people. And there are many ways to that.
Three ways that I consider among the best are following the rule "Live
and let others live!" (See Learn the skills of Finns
http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/), selfishness-based moral in the
same blog and more widely moral at large (See
http://healthilymoral.blogspot.fi) and then my own social skill from
my twenties, see World is of love (a mechanical model)
http://healthilymoral.blogspot.fi/2011/08/world-is-of-love.html .
Common sense and a picture of the whole are also needed, see the first
mentioned blog."

Theupbringing of children, thinking errors and moral

Some quite easy things, if you notice them, help you to be moral.
Children at some age are interested in what is a good tactic in the world and in life. Healthy versus broken is a good comparison to make estimates on strenght. Noticing that healthy is also according to feelings, helps to fit into the same picture likings, needs and civilized values.
Babies have a great potential but all do not end likewise intelligent. That seems to be commected to how they make divisions, what is the basic structure like that they seek for and that seems to be connected to the visual environment as a baby. Admiring trees and the nature as a baby could offer more sensitive, more intelligent, more feeling, more rational, more practical way of looking at things and understanding them intellectually. Also later on comparing one's thought to nature landscape could increase understanding.
Already as a child people have different liking on what areas of life they want to most associate with and work in as adults. Trying to compete with others in their strenghts often ends up trying to replace those areas of life by one's own favorite areas of life. So instead of competing about position, searching for one's own place in the world, the smaller the more one area of life centered one wants to be, and using on other areas of life other ways of thinking and values suited to cultivating those things could bring a much more moral result as long as one understands that soldiers fight for better life and inbetter living conditions and not just for destruction only and that soldiers too need skills like sports etc and that one has the right to be an individual as far as one is moral enough, for example follows the saying "Live and let others live!".

Tidying behaviour to moral

If some group or nation, which has high skill but a lack of moral, would like to by it's own common effort tidy it's behaviour to superbly moral, then setting the areas that deeds affect in the world according to the rule "Live and let others live!", see http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2012/10/live-and-let-others-live.html , would without altering much of what is done and what is not done or people's level of moral otherwise, lead to excellent moral and so propably to a much much higher position in the world.

Also, if some group is interested mainly at the level of individuals and has a lack of moral, it could propably tidy it'sbehaviour to quite moral by adding to each deed at it's planning phace as the last thing done looking at the thing in the wide context of the world and finding ways to somewhat alter the thing done so that it would be moral in the world. This has to do with the fact that you need to look at the world before you can arrive at things well for the world, you have to aim at moral efore you can succeed at being moral. And the last thing thought of typically settles side issues, the ones not central in one's attention.

Translation rights

One can tranbslate this blog and my texts and my videos (khtervola) on links from this blog, morally to other languages.

Moral is the most benefical option

Please see the English text at http://paratiisiteoria.blogspot.fi/2013/09/paratiisissa-on-kaarme.html